Welcome Michael, from thelivingwest, aka Russell Hartill. I am a mine historian, mine explorationist, and local attorney with a background in historic preservation and mining law. [I know, quite a diverse spread of interest.] I would be happy to answer general or specific questions on mining law as it relates to caves and vice versa either here or on cavechat.org, or via pm....
I agree with you in that mutual respect between us will help combine efforts against mine/cave closures. Many of the MU members will appreciate your website and in particular this webpage that supports keeping mines open:
I recommend to any MU member to please read this article before assuming Mike Leavitt is the enemy. We all have common enemies and it is not each other.
I have recently crossed over and introduced myself on cavechat.org, and after an initial bashing, have found some cavers that feel the way I do about mine exploration. And I find on the caver.org site a spirited discussion of whether or not to publically advertise cave locations. We MU types have had a similar discussion amongst ourselves about whether or not to give out lat and long on mine features.
So, in answer to the question, how far apart are we? The answer is not easy to pinpoint but my sense is that we are NOT that far apart, and in the joint interest of our love and passion for the underground, we are better served coordinating and engaging in dialogue with one another to preserve and guarantee access to the underground values we cherish.
Some of us might actually be a little jealous of your ability to obtain BLM and or SITLA agreements and management of underground values may require such agreements to satisfy government concerns over liability, insurance, and federal regs. Some of us may have a knee jerk reaction against most forms of governmental regulation and destruction of mining history, esp. the destructive backfilling of mine openings without ever having surveyed the underground of many of Utah's most famous mines and mining districts. That knee jerk reaction may extend to unfairly judging those who have made a tentative peace with these agencies for the control and access of underground resources they love.
In the end, I would welcome a discussion and sharing of ideas on how to incorporate our interests and getting more involved in the early planning process with those agencies most directly responsible for mine closures. For example and specifically:
Dale Green recently mentioned that he and others were involved with DOGM in giving advice to them on Nutty Putty and mines in the area in relation to the North Tintic EAST project, scheduled to go to bid next year. Dale said the DOGM has already promised money and help in preserving Nutty Putty's access, and yet we have not been given access to nor have we been invited to advise ANYONE on our concerns for the mines we appreciate in the North Tintic East area. ANY advice, strategy, names, etc you could share with us to begin a dialogue with would be welcomed...
An example: The Selma mine, has been recommended by at least one caver, for CLOSURE, after he and others surveyed it to their satisfaction. We would like the chance to survey it ourselves, before the BLM seals it shut. We politely disagree with this caver in his recommendation to close the Selma Mine, which has a rich history.... Your thoughts on how to bridge this gap between those who enter mines, and find no cave values so recommend their closure, and us, who may race past cave features in a effort to find mine values... would be appreciated...
Again, Welcome...
I agree with you in that mutual respect between us will help combine efforts against mine/cave closures. Many of the MU members will appreciate your website and in particular this webpage that supports keeping mines open:
I recommend to any MU member to please read this article before assuming Mike Leavitt is the enemy. We all have common enemies and it is not each other.
I have recently crossed over and introduced myself on cavechat.org, and after an initial bashing, have found some cavers that feel the way I do about mine exploration. And I find on the caver.org site a spirited discussion of whether or not to publically advertise cave locations. We MU types have had a similar discussion amongst ourselves about whether or not to give out lat and long on mine features.
So, in answer to the question, how far apart are we? The answer is not easy to pinpoint but my sense is that we are NOT that far apart, and in the joint interest of our love and passion for the underground, we are better served coordinating and engaging in dialogue with one another to preserve and guarantee access to the underground values we cherish.
Some of us might actually be a little jealous of your ability to obtain BLM and or SITLA agreements and management of underground values may require such agreements to satisfy government concerns over liability, insurance, and federal regs. Some of us may have a knee jerk reaction against most forms of governmental regulation and destruction of mining history, esp. the destructive backfilling of mine openings without ever having surveyed the underground of many of Utah's most famous mines and mining districts. That knee jerk reaction may extend to unfairly judging those who have made a tentative peace with these agencies for the control and access of underground resources they love.
In the end, I would welcome a discussion and sharing of ideas on how to incorporate our interests and getting more involved in the early planning process with those agencies most directly responsible for mine closures. For example and specifically:
Dale Green recently mentioned that he and others were involved with DOGM in giving advice to them on Nutty Putty and mines in the area in relation to the North Tintic EAST project, scheduled to go to bid next year. Dale said the DOGM has already promised money and help in preserving Nutty Putty's access, and yet we have not been given access to nor have we been invited to advise ANYONE on our concerns for the mines we appreciate in the North Tintic East area. ANY advice, strategy, names, etc you could share with us to begin a dialogue with would be welcomed...
An example: The Selma mine, has been recommended by at least one caver, for CLOSURE, after he and others surveyed it to their satisfaction. We would like the chance to survey it ourselves, before the BLM seals it shut. We politely disagree with this caver in his recommendation to close the Selma Mine, which has a rich history.... Your thoughts on how to bridge this gap between those who enter mines, and find no cave values so recommend their closure, and us, who may race past cave features in a effort to find mine values... would be appreciated...
Again, Welcome...
Comment